Articles Posted in Medical Malpractice

In our last post, we began looking at the issue of medication errors, particularly the fact that the electronic systems used by physicians in many hospitals allow a significant number of potentially harmful errors to go undetected. As we noted, not every medication error results in harm to a patient. In many cases, the error is inconsequential or has a minimal impact on the patient. In some cases, though, medication errors can have more serious consequences.

Medication errors can take various forms. An obvious mistake is for a provider to make an incorrect drug selection, but it can also occur that the drug is not administered at the correct time, is administered incorrectly, or that an expired drug is administered. Errors may also occur in reviewing a prescribed drug regimen for appropriateness. 

Depending on the type of error in question, there can be a variety of causes for medication errors. According to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, common causes of medication errors include poor physician handwriting, improper transcription of prescription, confusion about drug nomenclature, and inaccurate calculation of drug dosage. Failure of electronic health records systems can, as we’ve noted, also be a cause of medication errors as well. Physicians are not the only possible liable party, either. Other medical staff, including pharmacists, can make errors with medications which end up negatively impacting a patient.

Medical malpractice comes in many different forms, but medication errors are a particularly common occurrence in hospital settings. Electronic systems have been developed to help reduce medication errors, and they have been a huge help. The use of computerized physician order entry systems has been highly encouraged by the federal government, and nearly all hospitals use these systems.  Unfortunately, there are still too many mistakes made with medication.

According to a recent report by data analytics company Castlight Health and the hospital rating company LeapFrog Group, computer systems designed to address medication errors still fail to catch around 13 percent of potentially fatal drug-related mistakes. The research also shows that roughly 40 percent of the most serious and common errors are able to slip by these systems. 

The recent study adds to the growing body of evidence showing that improvements still need to be made to computerized physician order entry systems. Previous studies have likewise shown that computerized physician order entry systems sometimes fail to detect inaccurate patient information.

Last time, we began discussing the currently volatility in the New York medical malpractice market. As we noted, the situation not only puts physicians at risk, but also patients who attempt to sue physicians covered by insurance providers who become insolvent.

We mentioned that the number of medical malpractice claims has decreased in the last decade—dropping 32 percent between 2004 and 2014—but there is also the fact that payouts on claims are decreasing as well. In such a situation, insurance companies can maximize their profits since they aren’t paying as much on claims. Again, it remains to be seen how the situation will be addressed by regulators and lawmakers, but patients are bound to be affected in some way if nothing is done. 

Quickly filing a medical malpractice claim when one is harmed by a physician is not necessarily the best solution. When a patient suspects he or she may have suffered injury at the hands of a negligent physician, what really needs to be done is to consult with an experienced attorney who can look at the case and determine what evidence there may be to support a claim for medical malpractice. If there is merit to the case, it needs to also be determined what types and amounts of damages likely to result from the bringing the case.

Medical malpractice liability is an important factor for physicians in every area of medical care. The costs associated with malpractice liability can be significant, because the costs of medical negligence are often so great for injured patients.

Each state has a slightly different landscape when it comes to malpractice liability. In New York’s current system, there are five medical malpractice carriers, each of which is required to pay into a guaranty fund serving as a safety net in the event one of the insurer’s fails. Out-of-state carriers are not bound by the same requirement, and can thus charge less for coverage. In-state providers are having a hard time competing with the low rates of out-of-state providers, and this isn’t really a benefit to patients. 

There are undoubtedly many factors affecting the current medical malpractice market in New York, and there isn’t necessarily a whole lot individual patients can do about it. Perhaps lawmakers and state regulators will come up with a solution to the problem, though it isn’t clear exactly what they would do to address it. One of the factors is that a significant number of insurance providers have come into the New York market in recent years because of a variety of factors. Because federal law exempts out-of-state providers from the state’s regulatory requirements, instability has resulted.

There is always some potential for something to go wrong in terms of medical care. In some instances the problem that occurs is very minor and sometimes even goes unnoticed. In other circumstances, the issue could have some very serious consequences, especially if the problem is not identified in its early stages.

Oftentimes, even if a patient suspects that there is some kind of problem in terms of their medical care, they may refrain from bringing it up or discussing it with anyone because they wholeheartedly trust the medical professionals working on their case. Telling a doctor that they are making a mistake can be extremely difficult for some individuals, especially those that tend to be quiet. Furthermore, a person who is incapacitated to any degree may not be able to speak up at all.

But in many serious medical negligence cases, there comes a certain breaking point. It’s a point where the consequences of the negligence are seen very clearly, such as severe side effects from taking the wrong medication. In these cases a patient might feel angry or upset and wonder what they can do to remedy the issue.

We hear about a lot of different types of medical malpractice cases but the stories that are often the hardest to hear about are those involving children. As parents, we will often trust medical professionals in terms of their treatment recommendations when our children are facing serious medical problems. We want what is best for our children and hope experienced medical professionals can help our family.

A case involving a toddler has recently reached a settlement of $30 million to be paid to the family. The toddler apparently suffered a catastrophic brain injury due to surgical complications. The child reportedly underwent around 25 experimental surgeries after he was born with a leak in his esophagus in 2009.

The last surgery performed on the child was in 2011 and involved using a suturing device. That device severed the child’s pulmonary artery. The child currently deals with cerebral palsy and an irreversible brain injury. Other surgeries performed involved the use of a stent to fix the leak. The family’s attorney says the doctor who performed the surgeries deviated from the acceptable standard of care and was medically careless.

There is a lot of stigma surrounding medical malpractice lawsuits. Some might think that far too many people file lawsuits against physicians or big entities every year in hopes of securing a big award. Considering they are covered by malpractice insurance, some might think that everyone is reaching for a chance to sue them.

But in many cases, that’s simply not the case. There are many patients in our country that are hurt every year by the negligence of medical professionals but feel too scared to file a lawsuit. They may feel like they don’t have a case, may not want to go through the effort and stress of filing a lawsuit, or they may feel bad for even considering it. While all these emotions are understandable, it’s important to remember the purpose of a medical malpractice lawsuit.

A medical malpractice lawsuit aims to secure compensation for individuals who have been hurt by the negligence of others. Some patients end up having to deal with unimaginable medical bills in order to deal with the medical error they experienced. Those same individuals may also end up being out of work for weeks or even months, causing them to lose significant amounts of income. While these individuals still may feel worried about the implications of filing a lawsuit, for many people it is the only viable choice that may help them get back on their feet.

There is some risk associated with undergoing just about any surgery. Whether it’s a lifesaving surgery or a cosmetic one, people in our state make decisions every day to go under the knife. When patients hear that the surgery they need is “minimally invasive,” they may feel a bit more secure in its safety. Unfortunately, even a minimally invasive surgery can have tragic outcomes if medical negligence is involved.

Recently, a jury awarded $3 million to the husband of a woman who passed away in another state. The woman had surgery to remove an ovarian cyst in 2009. Just two days later, she passed away. According to a news report, the woman’s bowel was pierced during the surgery. The medical malpractice claim said the surgeon failed to check the woman’s bowel for cuts, and that he also mishandled the woman’s complaints after the surgery.

According to the physician’s lawyer, the jury felt he did a good job on the surgery but should have told the woman to head to the emergency room “more urgently” after she started belching. The jury held the clinic and the doctor who did the surgery accountable for the incident. Two other defendants were not found to be at fault in this case.

New York City has the largest municipal health care system in the United States. There are 11 public hospitals in New York City, which are run by the City Health and Hospitals Corporation. Because of its sheer size, it’s important for the city and for patients to know these hospitals’ medical malpractice statistics.

Information has recently come out from the New York City Comptroller’s Office that shows the number of medical malpractice lawsuits that were filed against these city-owned hospitals has increased in fiscal year 2015. That year saw 521 lawsuits as opposed to 495 in fiscal year 2013.

Although the news isn’t very positive, the trend is still moving downward since 2015 saw fewer cases than 2013. Not only that, but it’s important to point out that while some of the individual hospitals saw an increase in cases, others saw a decrease for fiscal year 2015.

A very interesting case recently made it to New York’s highest court that brings up a unique issue when it comes to medical malpractice lawsuits.

We have extensively discussed medical malpractice lawsuits on our blog that involve a patient who was injured due to alleged negligence by a medical professional. If that individual was injured, he or she may file a lawsuit. In other cases we also hear about someone dying due to alleged negligence and their family filing a medical malpractice lawsuit on their behalf.

But what happens when the injury happens to a third party? This is exactly the issue that the higher court recently took on.