{"id":2857,"date":"2020-07-08T16:37:49","date_gmt":"2020-07-08T20:37:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/?p=2857"},"modified":"2020-07-08T16:37:49","modified_gmt":"2020-07-08T20:37:49","slug":"new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/","title":{"rendered":"New York Court Agrees that Summary Judgment to Manufacturer of Mixer-Grinder Was Appropriate in Butcher&#8217;s Product Liability Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A Syracuse product liability case may involve one defendant, two defendants, or a long list of defendants. There may be a single theory of liability, or there may be multiple claims involving a myriad of legal theories.<\/p>\n<p>One thing that is common to all product liability claims is that they demand an appropriate amount of time and attention in order to be successful; product makers fight <em>hard<\/em> against a finding of liability! A primary reason for this is the fear of manufacturers and others in the supply chain that, if one plaintiff is successful, it may open a floodgate to additional claims, potentially costing the business millions of dollars in payouts.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, defendants in these types of cases are typically very aggressive in their efforts to avoid being held liable for injuries caused by allegedly defective products. Often, this process includes a motion for summary judgment attempting to get the case dismissed before it reaches the consideration of a jury.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/#more-2857\" class=\"more-link\">Continue Reading \u203a<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Syracuse product liability case may involve one defendant, two defendants, or a long list of defendants. There may be a single theory of liability, or there may be multiple claims involving a myriad of legal theories. One thing that is common to all product liability claims is that they demand an appropriate amount of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2857","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-defective-products"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>New York Court Agrees that Summary Judgment to Manufacturer of Mixer-Grinder Was Appropriate in Butcher&#039;s Product Liability Case &#8212; Syracuse Personal Injury Law Blog &#8212; July 8, 2020<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A Syracuse product liability case may involve one defendant, two defendants, or a long list of defendants. There may be a single theory of liability, or &#8212; July 8, 2020\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"New York Court Agrees that Summary Judgment to Manufacturer of Mixer-Grinder Was Appropriate in Butcher&#039;s Product Liability Case &#8212; Syracuse Personal Injury Law Blog &#8212; July 8, 2020\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"A Syracuse product liability case may involve one defendant, two defendants, or a long list of defendants. There may be a single theory of liability, or &#8212; July 8, 2020\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jeff DeFrancisco\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New York Court Agrees that Summary Judgment to Manufacturer of Mixer-Grinder Was Appropriate in Butcher's Product Liability Case &#8212; Syracuse Personal Injury Law Blog &#8212; July 8, 2020","description":"A Syracuse product liability case may involve one defendant, two defendants, or a long list of defendants. There may be a single theory of liability, or &#8212; July 8, 2020","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"New York Court Agrees that Summary Judgment to Manufacturer of Mixer-Grinder Was Appropriate in Butcher's Product Liability Case &#8212; Syracuse Personal Injury Law Blog &#8212; July 8, 2020","twitter_description":"A Syracuse product liability case may involve one defendant, two defendants, or a long list of defendants. There may be a single theory of liability, or &#8212; July 8, 2020","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jeff DeFrancisco","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/"},"author":{"name":"Jeff DeFrancisco","@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/798006ba40dee3a60d61603f8022a9f9"},"headline":"New York Court Agrees that Summary Judgment to Manufacturer of Mixer-Grinder Was Appropriate in Butcher&#8217;s Product Liability Case","datePublished":"2020-07-08T20:37:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/"},"wordCount":561,"articleSection":["Defective Products"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/","name":"New York Court Agrees that Summary Judgment to Manufacturer of Mixer-Grinder Was Appropriate in Butcher's Product Liability Case &#8212; Syracuse Personal Injury Law Blog &#8212; July 8, 2020","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-08T20:37:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/798006ba40dee3a60d61603f8022a9f9"},"description":"A Syracuse product liability case may involve one defendant, two defendants, or a long list of defendants. There may be a single theory of liability, or &#8212; July 8, 2020","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/new-york-court-agrees-that-summary-judgment-to-manufacturer-of-mixer-grinder-was-appropriate-in-butchers-product-liability-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New York Court Agrees that Summary Judgment to Manufacturer of Mixer-Grinder Was Appropriate in Butcher&#8217;s Product Liability Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/","name":"Syracuse Personal Injury Law Blog","description":"Published by New York Medical Malpractice Attorneys \u2014 DeFrancisco &amp; Falgiatano","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/798006ba40dee3a60d61603f8022a9f9","name":"Jeff DeFrancisco","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7f6660cf0b9e029623b52ccc2e33d1fef7eb66d590325c2b6a1fb85d5ef1e2cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7f6660cf0b9e029623b52ccc2e33d1fef7eb66d590325c2b6a1fb85d5ef1e2cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7f6660cf0b9e029623b52ccc2e33d1fef7eb66d590325c2b6a1fb85d5ef1e2cb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jeff DeFrancisco"}}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2857"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2857\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2861,"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2857\/revisions\/2861"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.defranciscolaw.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}