DeFrancisco & Falgiatano Law Firm
Call now for a Free consultation

Could non-economic damages caps be discriminatory?

In our prior post, we talked about how caps on non-economic damages could be harmful to medical malpractice plaintiffs, in that they may not compensate injuries that involve a great deal of pain and suffering or long-term emotional injuries. With these scenarios possible when medical negligence mars procedures involving reproductive organs or victims of sexual assault, could it be that some malpractice victims are treated differently than others?

According to a study about women, children and elderly medical malpractice victims, it appears that their injuries are largely compensated through non-economic damages, which are capped at $250,000 in a number of states. 

Essentially, damages caps create an unfair value system where certain members of society may not recover what they should be entitled to based on the nature of their injury. Instead, damages may be determined on a person’s earning capacity. Since women tend to be awarded more than men when it comes to non-economic damages, such caps could be seen as discriminatory and work towards an unequal system of access to justice.

Further, a recent study finds that economic caps affect victims of pediatric malpractice more than women. The study also suggests that if victims of heart disease were considered, senior citizens who are malpractice victims would be largely affected as well.

Fortunately, New York currently does not have such limitations. But it is a constant battle in the state to stave off challenges to impose such caps similar to those in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Michigan and California. It remains to be seen whether a cap will be imposed in the future, but the discriminatory effect it would have on women and children cannot be ignored. 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Honors & Accreditations

Free Case Evaluation Form You will receive a prompt response to your evaluation.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy



East Syracuse Office
6739 Myers Road
East Syracuse, NY 13057

East Syracuse Law Office Map

Oneida Office
312 Broad Street
Oneida, NY 13421

Oneida Law Office Map

Watertown Office
119 Sherman Street
Watertown, NY 13601

Watertown Law Office Map

New Hartford Office
23 Oxford Road
New Hartford, NY 13413

New Hartford Law Office Map

Oswego Office
92 W. 6th Street
Oswego, NY 13126

Oswego Law Office Map

Cortland Office
26 Court Street
Cortland, NY 13045

Cortland Law Office Map

Rochester Office
510 Clinton Square
Rochester, NY 14604

Rochester Law Office Map

Phone: 315-479-9000
Fax: 315-479-9300
Back To Top